Cracking the Fed's Façade: A Supreme Court Ruling That Could Shatter the Debt Myth

A Supreme Court Ruling Throws Open the Possibility That the $36 Trillion Debt Burden Really Belongs to the Bankers, Not the Public.

It’s a cold, drizzly English morning in late May, the kind of weather that begs for a steaming cup of tea and a plate of eggs Benedict, the hollandaise sauce pooling decadently around a perfectly poached egg. I’m sitting at my table, fork in hand, ready to dig into both my breakfast and a topic that’s been simmering in my mind like the butter in that sauce. A recent Supreme Court ruling has set tongues wagging, and I’m here to stir the pot with a bit of irreverence and a lot of skepticism.

The ruling in question?

The court has declared that the President—let’s call him the Golden-Haired Executive for a bit of flair—can fire the heads of so-called “independent” Government agencies, but when it comes to the Federal Reserve, he’s got to keep his hands off. The Fed, you see, is a “uniquely structured, quasi-private entity.” My eggs quiver on the plate as I ponder the implications. Quasi-private? What a delightfully slippery phrase! Let’s crack this open and see what’s inside

The Supreme Court’s decision is a double-edged sword, sharp enough to draw blood from the bureaucratic beast. On one hand, it’s a power boost for the Executive branch, a green light to clean house at agencies that have long hidden behind the shield of “independence.” On the other, it’s a stark revelation about the Federal Reserve, that shadowy institution born in 1913 from a Congress that might have been either woefully naive or deeply corrupt—take your pick. The Fed isn’t part of the government, not really. It’s a hybrid, a chimera of private banks stitched together with a board of Governors that the President appoints but can’t control. It sits on its own little fiefdom in Washington, D.C., immune to U.S. laws in ways that would make a feudal lord jealous. And for over a century, it’s held the reins of the nation’s money supply, set interest rates, and—most crucially—managed a national debt that now looms at a jaw-dropping $36 trillion, a figure so monstrous it could make even the most stoic among us choke on their muffin.

But here’s where the plot thickens, much like the hollandaise I’m spooning onto my plate. If the Fed is a private entity, as the Supreme Court has so tantalizingly suggested, then what does that mean for the debt it holds?

We’ve been told for decades—by politicians, economists, and the Fed itself—that this debt is societies, a collective burden Americans must bear, a legacy of shame to pass down to future generations. But what if that’s a grand deception? What if the debt, held by this quasi-private institution, is actually the Fed’s problem, a liability it’s cleverly shifted onto the public through a century of legal trickery and smoke-and-mirrors accounting?

This isn’t some wild-eyed theory spun by internet sleuths in dark corners of the web. It’s a question rooted in the Fed’s very structure. The Federal Reserve was created to stabilize the economy, sure, but it was also designed to serve the interests of the private banks that own it—think of the big players like JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs, who’ve raked in profits from the interest on government bonds.

The Fed has spent decades buying up U.S. Treasuries, essentially lending money to the Government at a cost. If it’s a private entity, then that debt is a private contract, isn’t it? So why are the American people, being told that they owe it? Why are the public the ones sweating over a $36 trillion tab when the Fed’s private owners might be the ones who should be footing the bill?

Let’s indulge in a bit of speculative mischief, shall we? Imagine the Golden-Haired Executive, with his knack for shaking things up, decides to test this theory. He could stand up and say, “Sorry, folks, but this debt isn’t ours—it’s yours, dear private bankers.”

The dollar, after all, is a legal fiction, its value propped up by the Fed’s monopoly on money creation. The Government doesn’t owe the Fed a dime; if anything, the Fed owes the Government for the privilege of playing in its sandbox. The Fed’s balance sheet is already a mess, bloated with trillions in bad debt from years of reckless bond-buying. If the Government were to push the issue—say, by refusing to raise the debt ceiling later this year—the Fed would have to keep buying Treasuries to keep the lights on. Each purchase would dig it deeper into the red, potentially bankrupting its private owners. And here’s the kicker: the Government wouldn’t have to bail them out. Why should it? The Fed is private, as the Supreme Court has so helpfully pointed out. Let the Bankers stew in their own juice for a change.

Could this really happen?

Oh, it’s not just a pipe dream—it’s a tantalizing possibility. The Fed’s financial house is built on sand, propped up by years of easy money and low rates. Pushing it to the brink wouldn’t take much, and the political will might just be there. For too long, Central Banks like the Fed have operated in the shadows, wielding immense power while pretending to serve the public good. They’ve convinced us that their debts are our debts, that their failures are our failures. But what if we’ve been conned? What if the Fed’s quasi-private status is the key to unraveling a century of financial manipulation?

As I mop up the last of my hollandaise and watch the rain streak down the window, I can’t help but grin at the audacity of the idea. The Supreme Court’s ruling has cracked open a door, exposing the Fed’s true nature for all to see. Whether the Golden-Haired Executive—or anyone else—has the plums to walk through that door is another question, but the mere possibility is enough to make my pulse quicken. If the debt belongs to the Fed’s private owners, then we’re on the verge of a reckoning—a chance to rewrite the rules of money, power, and accountability. The Bankers who’ve controlled our economy’s for over a century might finally be forced to face the music, and I’d pay good money to see that showdown.

So, could this really happen?

In a world where the Supreme Court can call the Fed a private entity without batting an eye, I’d say the odds are better than you might think. So pass the tea, dear reader, as events just became very interesting indeed.

If you enjoyed this blog then feel free to share it to your MyFace socials and consider subscribing, it's free after.